Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Browse Articles Search Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 219
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
J Res Med Sci 2022,  27:36

Evaluation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus virulence genes and antibiotics susceptibility in Iranian population


1 Pediatric Infections Research Center, Research Institute for Children Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Pediatric Infections Research Center, Research Institute for Children Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran; Department of Pediatrics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Clinical Cancer Research Center, Milad General Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Date of Submission30-Jul-2019
Date of Decision02-Oct-2019
Date of Acceptance17-Dec-2021
Date of Web Publication30-May-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Zahra Pourmoghaddas
Pediatric Infections Research Center, Research Institute for Children Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_543_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one most important pathogens for human health. The ability of this organism for producing different kinds of disease is related to its virulence gene. The frequency of hemolysin alpha (hla), hemolysin beta (hlb), and exfoliative toxin A (eta) virulence genes of MRSA was evaluated, and the association of these genes with antibiotics susceptibility was investigated. Materials and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a total of 695 Staphylococcus clinical samples from seven different provinces of Iran were evaluated. MRSA was detected by cefoxitin disk. Virulence genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction. Susceptibility to clindamycin and ciprofloxacin was evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline. Results: From a total of 695 samples, 170 (24.46%) were found to be MRSA. 142, 82, and 132 samples of MRSA were hla, hlb, and eta positive, respectively. hla gene was significantly found more frequently in patients at least 18 years (P = 0.02). 105 (68.6%) and 93 (59.6%) of MRSA samples were resistance to ciprofloxacin and clindamycin, respectively. hlb gene was significantly more resistant to clindamycin (P = 0.04) and ciprofloxacin (P = 0.01). Logistic regression analysis displayed hlb-positive MRSA strains were significantly associated with ciprofloxacin (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.637–8.00) and clindamycin (OR: 1.93, 95% CI 1.00–3.68). Conclusion: MRSA strains from Staphylococcus aureus which isolated from hospitalized Iranian patients are significantly resistant to clindamycin and ciprofloxacin and it is may be because of hlb virulence gene. These samples consist of both community-acquired MRS) and health-care associated MRSA, so we could not use this finding as a guide for local antibiotics usage.

Keywords: Ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, methicillin-resistant staphylococcus, virulence gene


How to cite this article:
Armin S, Karimi A, Pourmoghaddas Z, Azimi L, Fallah F, Valadan Tahbaz S. Evaluation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus virulence genes and antibiotics susceptibility in Iranian population. J Res Med Sci 2022;27:36

How to cite this URL:
Armin S, Karimi A, Pourmoghaddas Z, Azimi L, Fallah F, Valadan Tahbaz S. Evaluation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus virulence genes and antibiotics susceptibility in Iranian population. J Res Med Sci [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 30];27:36. Available from: https://www.jmsjournal.net/text.asp?2022/27/1/36/346298




  Introduction Top


Staphylococcus aureus is one of the main human pathogens causing various infectious diseases with different severity.[1] Methicillin resistance staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most considerable kinds of this microorganism due to beta-lactam antibiotics resistance.[2] During the first 30 years of recognition of this organism, MRSA caused infections in hospitalized patients in a way that healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) was introduced afterward.[3],[4] Furthermore, community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) became widespread, especially from 1990.[5] Universal appearance of MRSA is a major problem of health-care facilities worldwide.[5] The ability of this kind of Staphylococcus to cause different infections is mostly due to virulence genes.[6] The presence of these virulence factors facilitates invading the host immune system and different tissues.[7]

Exotoxins and exfoliating toxins are two major virulence factors of Staphylococcus.[8] Among exotoxins, hemolysin alpha (hla) causing neurotoxicity and dermo toxicity by producing pores in cell membranes of host and hemolysin beta (hlb) degrading the sphingomyelin of outer layer of human red blood cells are two examples of known exotoxins. In contrast, exfoliations are proteases cleaving superficial layer of skin consisted of desmosomal Catherine.[8],[9]

Recent researches revealed that disease severity and antibiotics susceptibility of this genus are different in various nations.[10],[11] To the best of our knowledge, there are few studies evaluating the association of exotoxins and exfoliative toxin and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus (R1). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of hla and hlb as exotoxins and exfoliative toxin A (eta) and its association with clindamycin and ciprofloxacin susceptibility of MRSA among Iranian patients.


  Materials and Methods Top


Sample selection

In a cross-sectional study done from April 2017 to April 2018, 695 Staphylococcus aureus specimens were gathered from seven different laboratories in seven distinct provinces of Iran which were accredited by the Iranian Health Ministry for detection of MRSA. These samples were obtained from wound, blood, tracheal aspiration, sputum, ear discharge, chest tube, bronchoalveolar lavage, bone, urine, synovial, and pleural effusion fluid, S. aureus isolates were obtained from/hospitalized patients with clinical signs and symptoms of colonization such as increased fever and white and blood cell counts admitted to hospital during 1 year. The study protocol was reviewed by the Ethical Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and approved by this IR.SBMU.MSP.REC.1397.631.

Detection of methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus

Mueller–Hinton agar medium and 30 μg cefoxitin antibiotic disc (Mast Co., UK) were used according to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) guidelines.[12],[13] Each strain with ≤21-mm inhibition zone around the cefoxitin after 16–18 h of incubation was considered positive MecA and consequently MRSA strains.[13],[14]

Ciprofloxacin and clindamycin susceptibility

Susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and clindamycin (2 μg) was performed with Kirby–Bauer method on Mueller–Hinton agar [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]. The results are interpreted by CLSI breakpoint. Control strain was S. aureus (ATCC 25923).[13],[14]
Table 4: Ciprofloxacin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and hemolysin alpha, hemolysin beta, and exfoliotoxin A

Click here to view
Table 5: The association of clindamycin resistance methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and virulence genes

Click here to view
Table 6: The association of ciprofloxacin resistance methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and virulence genes

Click here to view


Molecular detection of virulence genes

DNA was extracted by High Pure polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Template Preparation Kit (Thermo Fisher Co., USA) according to the standard protocol. The presence of the virulence genes including hla, hlb, and eta was distinguished by conventional PCR and specific primers shown in below [Table 1].[19],[20] PCR reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing the 12.5 μl of master mix (Cinnaclon, Tehran, Iran), 8.5 μl of distilled water, 10 pmol of each primer, and 1 μL of template DNA (3 μg/μL). The thermal cycling condition of the PCR mixture included an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min; 30 s at 53°C for hla and hlb and 51°C for eta followed with primer extension at 72°C for 45 s. The final extension step was done at 72°C for another 5 min. The PCR products were analyzed by gel document after electrophoresis.[15],[16],[17]
Table 1: Oligonucleotide primers used in the study

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). Fisher exact and Chi-square tests were used for the analysis of nominal data. All analyses were done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., version 21.0, Chicago, IL, USA), and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


Methicillin resistance staphylococcus aureus prevalence

From a total of 695 S. aureus isolated, 170 were found to be MRSA (24.46%). One hundred and fifteen (75.25%) MRSA belonged to adult patients older than 18 years and the rest of related to pediatrics (<18-year-old). Among seven different provinces, MRSA was more prevalent in Isfahan (26.8%). [Figure 1] depicts the distribution of MRSAs and their virulence genes in seven different Iranian cities. The highest frequency of MRSAs belonged to Isfahan (23.7%), and the lowest frequency of MRSAs showed up in Kordestan.
Figure 1: Distribution of methicillin resistance staphylococcus aureus and its virulence genes in eight different Iranian cities

Click here to view


Antibiotic susceptibility and virulence genes

105 (68.6%) and 93 (59.6%) MRSA samples were resistance to ciprofloxacin and clindamycin, respectively.

[Table 3] shows the distribution of clindamycin resistance MRSA according to virulence genes. Our data suggested that MRSA with hlb gene was significantly more resistant to clindamycin (P = 0.04).
Table 3: Clindamycin resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and hemolysin alpha, hemolysin beta, and exfoliotoxin A

Click here to view


Data analysis provided in [Table 3] also revealed the same results in terms of ciprofloxacin susceptibility (P = 0.01).

Virulence genes evaluation

Molecular method showed that 142, 82, and 132 samples of MRSA were hla, hlb, and eta positive, respectively. Among virulence gene, hla was more prevalent in MRSA strains (90.4%).

Although virulence genes were not significantly different in females and males (P = 0.54), hla gene was significantly found more frequently in patients at least 18 years (P = 0.02) [Table 2].
Table 2: Methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus virulence gene distribution according to sex and age

Click here to view


In the evaluation of coexistence of these three virulence genes, data revealed that none of the samples were hla and hlb positive, 124 (79%) were hla and eta positive, and 81 (51.6%) of them were positive for all virulence genes.

[Figure 1] shows the distribution of MRSA and its virulence gene.

Moreover, logistic regression analysis displayed hlb-positive MRSA strains were significantly associated with ciprofloxacin (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.637–8.00) and clindamycin (OR: 1.93, 95% CI 1.00–3.68) administration.


  Discussion Top


MRSA strains can cause the vast range of the infections and make therapeutic complications because of antibiotic resistance.[1] A few studies suggested relationship among exotoxins and exfoliative toxin and antibiotic susceptibility in MRSA strains (R1). The present study showed the frequency of MRSA among our samples was 24.46%. On the other hand, 68.6% and 59.6% of MRSA were resistant to ciprofloxacin and clindamycin, respectively. We also found that MRSA strains which had hlb gene were 3.62 and 1.93 times more resistant to ciprofloxacin and clindamycin, respectively. hla virulence gene was the most frequent one found in this population suffering from MRSA infection. Moreover, we found that MRSA-isolated samples significantly consisted more hla virulence factor.

A meta-analysis study in 2014 revealed that the CA-MRSA prevalence was approximately 50.2% in pediatric and 42.3% in adult populations.[16] Our study presented a lower frequency of MRSA than in the mentioned meta-analysis and other studies in North America and Europe.[18],[19],[20],[21] One study in Shiraz, Iran, showed that CA-MRSA prevalence was 42.3% in adult patients.[22] However, Sedighi et al. in Hamadan revealed a prevalence rate of 4.1% for CA-MRSA in children between 1 and 6 years.[23] Moreover, another study showed that CA-MRSA prevalence is lower in pediatrics than in adult population.[24] The lower than in aforementioned studies, the prevalence of MRSA in our study might be due to study population which consisted of a combined population of pediatric and adult participants. Another possible reason for the lower frequencies in our study_ is that, although our samples were all MRSA specimens, we did not separate CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA. Furthermore, Ghosh and Banerjee in a study which did not separated the strains of MRSA find the frequency of 23.9% for MRSA in line with our finding.[25]

In the present study, Staphylococcus strains were more resistant to clindamycin and ciprofloxacin rather than methicillin. In a study in India, 41.3% of MRSA was resistant to clindamycin.[25] On the other hand, another study mentioned that more than 55% of MRSA were resistant to ciprofloxacin.[26] This might be due to the more common usage of these antibiotics than oxacillin administration [Figure 1].[27],[28],[29]

Our outcomes revealed that hla virulence gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus is more prevalent in comparison with other genes, and this result was consistent with other studies in Iran and other parts of the world.[21],[22],[23],[24],[30]

This study declared that hla-positive MRSA was significantly more prevalent in adult population. Multiple articles discussed regulatory systems for Staphylococcus toxin virulence gene expression, in which one of these systems has been suggested to be accessory gene regulator (agr), causing production of autoinducer peptide (AIP). Induction of AIP production by agr A would ultimately lead to expression of hla gene,[31],[32],[33] and other studies showed that CA-MRSA has higher agr levels and HA-MRSA has mutation that found in agr.[34] Subsequent to agr mutation, agr A expression which produces more hla gene, increases. Over ally, the prevalence of CA-MRSA is higher in adult population and HA-MRSA is more prevalent in children. We did not separate HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA in this study. The adult population contributed to a higher proportion of the population of the present study. Therefore, more frequent hla gene might be due to more adult population of our study and the higher frequency of CA-MRSA in study population.

Strengths and limitations

Sampling from different states of Iran, including different age spectrum and quite large sample size and also equal methods for sampling and molecular methods were some study strengths, but in the present study, we could not separate the CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA, therefore; the data of Staphylococcus resistance to antibiotics could not be used for regional antibiotics prescription guidelines.


  Conclusion Top


The present study showed hlb-positive MRSA strain was 1.93 and 3.6 times more resistant to clindamycin and ciprofloxacin, respectively. Staphylococcus beta toxin which produce by hlb gene is contributed to biofilm formation[35] and this could explain our results. Another possibility could be this point that Staphylococcus beta toxin can stimulate interleukin 8 (IL-8) production, and this expression is associated with antibiotic resistance.[35],[36],[37]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG Jr. Staphylococcus aureus infections: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015;28:603-61.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Yaw LK, Robinson JO, Ho KM. A comparison of long-term outcomes after meticillin-resistant and meticillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: An observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14:967-75.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chang SC, Sun CC, Yang LS, Luh KT, Hsieh WC. Increasing nosocomial infections of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a teaching hospital in Taiwan. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1997;8:109-14.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K, Borchardt SM, Boxrud DJ, Etienne J, et al. Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA 2003;290:2976-84.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Weber JT. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41 Suppl 4:S269-72.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Laabei M, Recker M, Rudkin JK, Aldeljawi M, Gulay Z, Sloan TJ, et al. Predicting the virulence of MRSA from its genome sequence. Genome Res 2014;24:839-49.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Méndez-Vilas A. Microbial Pathogens and Strategies for Combating them: Science, Technology and Education. Formatex Research Center; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
El-Baz R, Rizk DE, Barwa R, Hassan R. Virulence characteristics and molecular relatedness of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus harboring different staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec. Microb Pathog 2017;113:385-95. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.11.021.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bokarewa MI, Jin T, Tarkowski A. Staphylococcus aureus: Staphylokinase. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2006;38:504-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Mohseni M, Rafiei F, Ghaemi EA. High frequency of exfoliative toxin genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical specimens in the north of Iran: Alarm for the health of individuals under risk. Iran J Microbiol 2018;10:158-65.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Al-Zoubi MS, Al-Tayyar IA, Hussein E, Jabali AA, Khudairat S. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical specimens in northern area of Jordan. Iran J Microbiol 2015;7:265-72.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Holmes A, Ganner M, McGuane S, Pitt TL, Cookson BD, Kearns AM. Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying Panton-Valentine leucocidin genes in England and Wales: Frequency, characterization, and association with clinical disease. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:2384-90.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Güler L, Ok U, Gündüz K, Gülcü Y, Hadimli HH. Antimicrobial susceptibility and coagulase gene typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine clinical mastitis cases in Turkey. J Dairy Sci 2005;88:3149-54.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Koosha RZ, Fooladi AA, Hosseini HM, Aghdam EM. Prevalence of exfoliative toxin A and B genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical specimens. J Infect Public Health 2014;7:177-85.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Suryadevara M, Clark AE, Wolk DM, Carman A, Rosenbaum PF, Shaw J. Molecular characterization of invasive Staphylococcus aureus infection in Central New York children: importance of two clonal groups and inconsistent presence of selected virulence determinants. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2013;2:30-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Futagawa-Saito K, Makino S, Sunaga F, Kato Y, Sakurai-Komada N, Ba-Thein W, et al. Identification of first exfoliative toxin in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2009;301:176-80.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Li S, Li J, Qiao Y, Ning X, Zeng T, Shen X. Prevalence and invasiveness of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A meta-analysis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2014;57:418-22.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
18.
Yu F, Liu Y, Lv J, Qi X, Lu C, Ding Y, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility, virulence determinant carriage and molecular characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with skin and soft tissue infections. Braz J Infect Dis 2015;19:614-22.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Otter JA, French GL. Molecular epidemiology of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis 2010;10:227-39.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray S, et al. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 2007;298:1763-71.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Wang CC, Lo WT, Chu ML, Siu LK. Epidemiological typing of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from children in Taiwan. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:481-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Hoseini Alfatemi SM, Motamedifar M, Hadi N, Sedigh Ebrahim Saraie H. Analysis of virulence genes among Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Strains. Jundishapur J Microbiol 2014;7:e10741.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Sedighi I, Moez HJ, Alikhani MY. Nasal carriage of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns in children attending day-care centers. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 2011;58:227-34.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Waryah CB, Gogoi-Tiwari J, Wells K, Eto KY, Masoumi E, Costantino P, et al. Diversity of virulence factors associated with west Australian methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolates of human origin. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:8651918. doi: 10.1155/2016/8651918.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ghosh S, Banerjee M. Methicillin resistance & inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Res 2016;143:362-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
26.
Daum TE, Schaberg DR, Terpenning MS, Sottile WS, Kauffman CA. Increasing resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990;34:1862-3.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Stein M, Komerska J, Prizade M, Sheinberg B, Tasher D, Somekh E. Clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus strains in Israel: Implications for empirical treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. Int J Infect Dis 2016;46:18-21.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Eksi F, Gayyurhan ED, Bayram A, Karsligil T. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from southeastern Turkey. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2011;44:57-62.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Chakrakodi B, Prabhakara S, Nagaraj S, Etienne J, Arakere G. High prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in community associated Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care Indian hospital. Adv Microbiol 2014;4:133.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Wang X, Li X, Liu W, Huang W, Fu Q, Li M. Molecular characteristic and virulence gene profiles of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from pediatric patients in Shanghai, China. Front Microbiol 2016;7:1818.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Lyon GJ, Wright JS, Muir TW, Novick RP. Key determinants of receptor activation in the agr autoinducing peptides of Staphylococcus aureus. Biochemistry 2002;41:10095-104.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Koenig RL, Ray JL, Maleki SJ, Smeltzer MS, Hurlburt BK. Staphylococcus aureus AgrA binding to the RNAIII-agr regulatory region. J Bacteriol 2004;186:7549-55.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Le KY, Otto M. Quorum-sensing regulation in Staphylococci – An overview. Front Microbiol 2015;6:1174.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Balasubramanian D, Harper L, Shopsin B, Torres VJ. Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis in diverse host environments. Pathog Dis. 2017;75(1):ftx005. doi:10.1093/femspd/ftx005.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Huseby MJ, Kruse AC, Digre J, Kohler PL, Vocke JA, Mann EE, et al. Beta toxin catalyzes formation of nucleoprotein matrix in Staphylococcal biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:14407-12.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Herrera A, Kulhankova K, Sonkar VK, Dayal S, Klingelhutz AJ, Salgado-Pabón W, et al. Staphylococcal β-toxin modulates human aortic endothelial cell and platelet function through sphingomyelinase and biofilm ligase activities. mBio 2017;8:e00273-17.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Huang FC, Huang SC. Differential effects of statins on inflammatory interleukin-8 and antimicrobial peptide human B-defensin 2 responses in Salmonella-infected intestinal epithelial cells. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:1650.  Back to cited text no. 37
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed382    
    Printed34    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded46    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal