The role of antiresorptive drugs and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in nononcologic immunosuppressed patients: A systematic review
Roberto Sacco1, Julian Woolley2, Julian Yates1, Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia3, Oladapo Akintola2, Vinod Patel4
1 The University of Manchester, Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Oral Surgery Department, Manchester, UK
2 King's College Dental Hospital, Oral Surgery Department, London, UK
3 Universidade Federal Fluminense, Dental School, Oral Surgery Department, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
4 Guy's Dental Hospital, Oral Surgery Department, London, UK
|Date of Submission||04-Jul-2020|
|Date of Decision||05-Aug-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||28-Jan-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||31-Mar-2021|
Dr. Roberto Sacco
Division of Dentistry, Manchester University, Coupland 3 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe condition affecting the jaws of patients exposed to specific drugs, and is primarily described in patients receiving bisphosphonate (BP) therapy. However, more recently it has been observed in patients taking other medications, such as the RANK ligand inhibitor (denosumab) and antiangiogenic drugs. It has been proposed that the existence of other concomitant medical conditions may increase the incidence of MRONJ. The primary aim of this research was to analyze all available evidence and evaluate the reported outcomes of osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) due to antiresorptive drugs in immunosuppressed patients. A multi-database (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) systematic search was performed. The search generated twenty-seven studies eligible for the analysis. The total number of patients included in the analysis was two hundred and six. All patients were deemed to have some form of immunosuppression, with some patients having more than one disorder contributing to their immunosuppression. Within this cohort the commonest trigger for MRONJ was a dental extraction (n=197). MRONJ complications and recurrence after treatment was sparsely reported in the literature, however a total of fourteen cases were observed. The data reviewed have confirmed that an invasive procedure is the commonest trigger of MRONJ with relatively high frequency of post-operative complications or recurrence following management. However, due to low-quality research available in the literature it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion on the outcomes analysed in this systematic review.
Keywords: Antiresorptive drugs, immunosuppress, intervention, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, osteonecrosis, patients
|How to cite this article:|
Sacco R, Woolley J, Yates J, Calasans-Maia MD, Akintola O, Patel V. The role of antiresorptive drugs and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in nononcologic immunosuppressed patients: A systematic review. J Res Med Sci 2021;26:23
|How to cite this URL:|
Sacco R, Woolley J, Yates J, Calasans-Maia MD, Akintola O, Patel V. The role of antiresorptive drugs and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in nononcologic immunosuppressed patients: A systematic review. J Res Med Sci [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 3];26:23. Available from: https://www.jmsjournal.net/text.asp?2021/26/1/23/312793
| Introduction|| |
The medical term medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw s (MRONJ) defines a potentially severe condition that is a result of using specific medications, such as antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drugs. These medications are used for the treatment of the skeletal manifestation of malignancies and/or bone metastases, and in the management of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, and hypercalcemia.,
Since the first clinical study of bisphosphonate-related ONJ (BRONJ) in 2003, a growing number of scientific articles have been published demonstrating similar complications connected with other medications, such as the RANK ligand inhibitor (denosumab) and monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies have been shown to contribute toward the development of similar lesions by binding and selectively inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor-A, specifically the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors.,, Due to the number of medications linked with the development of ONJ, in a 2014 positional paper, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) developed and defined the medical term MRONJ. The medications most commonly reported to be associated with MRONJ are listed in [Table 1].,
|Table 1: Antiresorptive drugs used in oncologic and nononcologic patients|
Click here to view
The AAOMS position paper states that patients should be considered to have MRONJ if all of the following characteristics are present:
- Current or previous treatment with antiresorptive or antiangiogenic agents
- Exposed bone or bone that can be probed through an intraoral or extraoral fistula in the maxillofacial region that has persisted for longer than 8 weeks
- No history of radiation therapy to the jaws or obvious metastatic disease to the jaws.
Following a diagnosis of MRONJ, the AAOMS classification and staging system can then be used to guide the management strategy [Table 2]. Furthermore, it is currently accepted that some patients may present with nonspecific symptoms and may not have evidence of exposed bone. In the most recent AAOMS positional paper, this category of patients has been classified as Stage 0.
|Table 2: Medication related of osteonecrosis of the jaw staging according to the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2014|
Click here to view
The staging of MRONJ is based entirely on clinical signs. This has been heavily criticized in some literature, which have emphasized the importance of radiological findings as a necessity for accurate MRONJ staging, and consequently in providing specific management strategies.,,
A major risk factor for the development of MRONJ is dentoalveolar surgery. A history of tooth extraction or oral surgery procedure (apicectomy or cystectomy) has been reported in 52%–80% of patients with MRONJ.,
Moreover, studies have also suggested that the risk of ONJ may be dependent on the potency of the antiresorptive agent and duration of treatment.,,, For instance, MRONJ is more common in patients receiving intravenous bisphosphonates (BPs) compared to oral BPs. The incidence of MRONJ can also vary based on the prior medical history of the patient and their indication for treatment with MRONJ-specific medication. Researches have reported that for patients treated with intravenous BP or denosumab, the incidence of MRONJ following the tooth extraction ranges from 1.6%–14.8% to 1.3%–15.6%, respectively, while the incidence is reported at only 0.5% for patients taking oral BP.,,
In addition to the signs, symptoms, and incidence of MRONJ, clinicians and surgeons need to be aware of the risk factors that can contribute to the development and severity of the condition. Exposure to antiresorptive and antiangiogenic therapy represents the primary risk factor for MRONJ; however, it has been established that MRONJ can be affected by other local and systemic factors. In the current literature, ONJ has been associated with and accelerated by certain medical conditions. For example, the presence of anemia, diabetes-mellitus, diseases of immunosuppression, and renal failure have all been reported to increase the incidence of MRONJ.,, However, it remains unclear whether these concomitant diseases or conditions are distinct contributing factors.,,,
Although MRONJ is debatably the most severe oral disease associated with antiresorptive medication, other side effects have been associated with and reported in patients undergoing antiresorptive drug therapy. These range from osseous and extraosseous adverse effects, upper gastrointestinal tract adverse effects, ocular adverse effects, renal toxicity, and hypocalcemia.,
The aim of this review is to analyze all available evidence and evaluate the reported outcomes in the development of MRONJ in immunosuppressed patients resulting from treatment with antiresorptive medications.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
The protocol of this review was registered in the international platform of registered systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (INPLASY) under number INPLASY202050114 (https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2020-5-0114/).
The following four databases were explored: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. A three-stage screening approach was used to ensure precision and safeguard the quality of the search. The screening of titles and abstracts was carried out independently by three authors (RS, JW, and OA) to eliminate any irrelevant material (i.e., reviews, animal studies, nonclinical studies, studies including oncology patients, and studies that did not report patients affected by immunosuppressed disease or therapy inducing immunosuppression). Disagreements were resolved by discussion until a consensus was reached.
A data screening and abstraction form was used to:
- Verify the study eligibility derived from the inclusion/exclusion criteria
- Carry out the methodological quality assessment
- Extract data on study characteristics and outcomes for the included studies [Figure 1].
The authors of any studies eligible for inclusion in the review with insufficient information were contacted directly to provide further information.
Focused question and Population Intervention Comparison Outcome strategy
Is there any sufficient evidence that nononcological immunosuppressed patients are at higher risk of developing ONJ due to antiresorptive drug therapy?
- Population (P): Any nononcological immunosuppressed patients previously or under treatment with antiresorptive drugs
- Interventions (I): Any type of intervention performed to treat MRONJ
- Comparison (C): Not applicable
- Outcome (O): State of knowledge regarding the risk of MRONJ as it relates to the type of drug, dose, time-to-event, and rate of recurrence/progression after treatment in the immunosuppressed category of patients.
A search strategy for all databases was developed as follows:
- Bisphosphonate [MeSH Terms] OR diphosphonate [MeSH Terms] OR Antiresorptive [MeSH Terms] OR Denosumab [MeSH Terms] OR Alendronic acid [MeSH Terms] OR Zoledronic acid [MeSH Terms] OR Pamidronate [MeSH Terms] OR Etidronate [MeSH Terms] OR Clodronate [MeSH Terms] OR Ibandronate [MeSH Terms] OR Risedronate [MeSH Terms] OR Tiludronate [MeSH Terms] OR Romosozumab [MeSH Terms]
- Osteonecrosis [MeSH Terms] OR Avascular osteonecrosis [MeSH Terms] OR Osteonecrosis of the jaw [MeSH Terms] OR MRONJ [MeSH Terms] OR ONJ [MeSH Terms] OR BONJ [MeSH Terms] OR ARONJ [MeSH Terms] OR BRONJ [MeSH Terms]
- HIV [MeSH Terms] OR AIDS [MeSH Terms] OR Transplant [MeSH Terms] OR Immunosuppress [MeSH Terms] OR Common variable immunodeficiency [MeSH Terms] OR CVID [MeSH Terms] OR alcoholism [MeSH Terms] OR diabetes [MeSH Terms] OR Selective immunoglobulin A deficiency [MeSH Terms] OR SIgAD [MeSH Terms] OR Immunologic deficiency [MeSH Terms] OR Adenosine deaminase deficiency [MeSH Terms] OR ADA [MeSH Terms] OR purine nucleoside phosphorylase (pnp) deficiency [MeSH Terms] OR PNP [MeSH Terms] OR Transcobalamin II deficiency [MeSH Terms] OR Thymic hypoplasia [MeSH Terms] OR X-linked agammaglobulinemia [MeSH Terms] OR Ataxia telangiectasia [MeSH Terms]
- 1 and 2 and 3.
The search strategy included appropriate changes in the keywords and followed the syntax rules of each database.
Criteria for inclusion in this review
Types of studies
The search strategy considered published randomized controlled trials, case–controlled studies, case series, retrospective observational studies, and case reports. Papers were obtained from January 2003 to April 2020. Animal studies, reviews, and those studies which included patients with a previous history of radiation therapy to the head and/or neck regions were excluded. No language restrictions were imposed to the search.
Types of participants
The review considered studies involving nononcological immunosuppressed patients who developed MRONJ [Table 3]. No restriction of age, gender, or ethnic origin was applied. There was also no restriction on the minimum number of patients included in the studies.
Types of outcome measures
The disease definition, as proposed by AAOMS, includes the persistence of exposed necrotic bone in the oral cavity for 8 weeks, despite adequate treatment, in a patient with current or a previous history of antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs, without local evidence of malignancy, and no prior radiotherapy to the affected region. A clinical staging system has been proposed to classify patients with established MRONJ, with appropriate treatment for each severity of the condition.
- Primary outcomes: Evaluate the current state of knowledge regarding the risk of MRONJ as it relates to the type of drug, dose, time-to-event, and rate of recurrence/progression after treatment in the immunosuppressed category of patients
- Secondary outcomes: Evaluate the contributing factors to the MRONJ:
- Invasive dental procedures
- Unfit dental prosthesis
- Spontaneous event
- Site of the necrosis (maxilla, mandible, and anterior or posterior of the jaws)
- Rate of complications related to the disease (fracture of the jaws, sepsis, etc.) and to the treatment of the disease (intra- or postoperative complications).
For the “complications” outcome measure, any intra- and postoperative surgical and nonsurgical complications were considered, e.g., fracture of osteosynthesis material, exposure of the reconstruction plate, etc.
Data extracted from the studies included the number of patients; patient gender and age; predisposing factors and localization of MRONJ; type of antiresorptive drug therapy and its cumulative dose; clinical indications for the drug or combined therapy; complications; follow-up time; and MRONJ recurrence.
All selected papers were carefully read to identify author(s); year of publication; study design; population; and treatment characteristics.
In the case of missing information, authors were contacted and 6 weeks was given for a response. If the information was still missing, missing data were presented as “not reported (NR)” in the results.
Review quality assessment data
Two review authors (RS and OA) appraised the risk of bias in the included study with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The authors used the consensus-based clinical case reporting guidelines development (CARE checklist) for case reports and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for case series/longitudinal studies., Any disagreements in the risk of bias assessments were referred to the third author of the review team (VP) and subsequently resolved by discussion. Levels of evidence were assessed according to the levels of evidence for therapeutic studies adapted from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
| Results|| |
Results were expressed as descriptive statistics because of the significant heterogeneity in the published data. There were no randomized controlled trials or case–controlled studies identified. A total of 27 articles were included in this review. All the published data described patients treated from 2009 to 2020. The types of articles that included within this review were case series (n = 8); case reports (n = 10); and retrospective observational studies (n = 9) [Table 4].,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
|Table 4: Studies included in the systematic review, including the number of patients and evidence level|
Click here to view
List of excluded studies
Following the initial search, we considered 68 studies to be potentially eligible for inclusion, but after a thorough inspection of the full-text articles, 41 were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria for this review [Table 5].,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, The remaining 27 papers were then analyzed for data extraction.
Immunosuppressed patients and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw data analysis
All 27 studies were published from 2009 to 2020 with results expressed as descriptive statistics.
A total of 206 patients with a mean age of 67.1 years (range 24–90 years) were included. One hundred and seventy-four patients were female (84.47%) and eight were male (3.88%). It was unclear for twenty patients (9.71%) and four patients did not have gender reported (1.94%) [Table 6].
|Table 6: Preoperative epidemiologic analysis (age, sex, predisposing factors, and site of the necrosis involved)|
Click here to view
The indications for treatment with an antiresorptive medication were osteoporosis (n = 181); prophylactically in combination with steroid therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (n = 11); Crohn's disease (n = 2); and sarcoidosis (n = 1). The indication for providing antiresorptive medication was not reported for one patient (n = 1). The most common antiresorptive medication was alendronate (n = 161). This was followed by risedronate (n = 12); clodronate (n = 7); ibandronate (n = 5); zoledronate (n = 4); and minodronate (n = 2). It was unclear what antiresorptive medication was used for 14 patients (n = 14) and not reported for one patient (n = 1). The mean time of exposure of antiresorptive medication prior to the presentation with MRONJ was 53.0 months (range 9–144 months) [Table 7].
|Table 7: Preoperative pharmacological analysis: type of drugs, indication for drug therapy, and time of drug exposure|
Click here to view
All patients had some form of immunosuppression as defined by the WHO. In some patients, they featured more than one disorder of immunosuppression. The most common disorder of immunosuppression was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 56). This was followed by diabetes (n = 49); a nonspecified diffuse disease of connective tissue (n = 7); Sjogren's syndrome (n = 5); a history of a transplant (n = 3), Crohn's disease (n = 2); sarcoidosis (n = 2); scleroderma (n = 1); and hypothyroidism (n = 1) [Table 7].
Of the papers reporting the etiology of MRONJ (n = 197), the most common trigger was an extraction (63.11%). This was followed by spontaneous development (13.59%); periodontal disease (4.37%); implant-related (2.43%); removable prosthesis-induced (1.94%); and trauma (0.49%). There was no identifiable trigger reported for ten patients (n = 10) [Table 6]. The staging of MRONJ was identified based on a reported diagnosis using the AAOMS diagnostic criteria or classified using the AAOMS diagnostic criteria based on the clinical and radiographical features reported in the papers. This was unclear or not reported for 74 patients (n = 74). For the remaining patients (n = 132), the majority of patients were identified as presenting with stage II MRONJ (63.64%). This was followed by presentations at stage I (13.64%); stage 0 (11.36%); and stage III (11.36%) [Table 6].
The site of MRONJ was reported for 137 patients (n = 137). Of those reported, MRONJ was most commonly reported in the mandible (63.50%), followed by the maxilla (32.85%). It was found in both the maxilla and mandible in five patients (3.65%). The region within the mandible or maxilla of MRONJ was not reported or unclear in 187 patients (n = 187) [Table 6].
Method of treatment; complications and recurrence were not well reported in the papers analyzed. Of the 28 patients that reported treatment, surgical treatment was the most common modality (n = 17), followed by conservative treatment (n = 7) and finally resection (n = 4). Of the eight patients with reported complications following treatment, infection was most common (n = 6), followed by progression of MRONJ (n = 2). It was reported that 31 patients did not develop any postoperative complications. Thirty-two did not have any recurrence of MRONJ following treatment (84.21%) [Table 8].
Risk of bias and review quality assessment
In the ten case report studies, a lack of clarity and missing data was identified in some of the 13 domains of the CARE Checklist. The lack of clarity was predominantly on reporting recurrence and the type of diagnostic procedures used at follow-up. Therefore, the level of bias for all the included case reports was graded as high. Regarding the retrospective and longitudinal case studies, there was a consistent lack of clarity in multiple domains of the STROBE Checklist. These were predominantly a result of the outcome measurement methods and inaccurate reporting of the frequency of recurrence and complications. Therefore, a high level of bias was considered for all retrospective and longitudinal case studies. Hence, the level of risk of bias across the case series, retrospective, and longitudinal studies was deemed to be high [Table 4].
According to the levels of evidence for therapeutic studies adapted from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, we found that the quality of the studies included in this systematic review was ranging from level III to level V. Most of the articles included were level V (n = 10) which have resulted in limiting the quality of evidence described in the MRONJ literature. Hence, the need for improving the quality level by performing randomized controlled trials to confirm the hypothesis that immunosuppressed diseases can highly increase the chances of developing MORNJ in nononcologic patients.
| Discussion|| |
The increased use of antiresorptive drugs has resulted in an increased incidence of patients suffering from MRONJ. Although the incidence of ONJ is rare, the development of ONJ can be devastating and the management extremely difficult. Recognition of patients who are at higher risk is therefore crucial. The epidemiology and pathogenesis are becoming clearer, but for the most part, remain unclear with many unknowns. Improvements have been made regarding its definition, diagnosis and staging, prevention strategies, and treatment in the last two decades. Additional risk factors have been recognized, such as intravenous bisphosphonate therapy, associated treatment with systemic steroids, and the literature suggests that local and systemic factors (such as periodontal disease and diabetes) might act as predisposing factors in the development of MRONJ, however it is unclear of the concomitant effect of immunosuppressive disorders on the development of MRONJ.,,,
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the current state of knowledge regarding the risk of ONJ as it relates to dose, duration, and rate of occurrence in the immunosuppressed category of patients.
This review demonstrated a variety of articles with patients suffering from different disorders of immunosuppression. Rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes were the most common of these. Interestingly, the other immunosuppressive disorders all involve therapeutic management with corticosteroids, an already known risk factor in the development of MRONJ. Despite this interesting finding, it is unclear on the degree of involvement of these disorders and so difficult to draw definite assumptions.
Similar to previous literature, this review demonstrated a larger proportion of female patients suffering from MRONJ, albeit an even higher proportion of the data set. Osteoporosis is more common in females and antiresorptive therapy is one of the most common management strategies for this disorder. This is one of the suggested explanations to explain the heightened frequency of MRONJ in females. However, it is unclear why the proportion of females is so much higher in the immunosuppressed category of patients as demonstrated in this study.
In this review, it was surprising to discover a high proportion of patients with a spontaneous onset of MRONJ (14.3%). This leads to the suggestion that certain systemic problems may enhance the susceptibility of the spontaneous development of MRONJ when compared to other osteometabolic patients.
Treatment of MRONJ is challenging, and an effective and appropriate therapy that substantially improves the outcome is yet to be determined. The majority of current research on the resolution, complications, and recurrence of MRONJ comes from a report of patients with multiple myeloma who were observed prospectively. MRONJ resolved in 62% of cases and recurred in 12%. This review found higher rates of recurrence (15.8%), which may be explained by the immunosuppression reducing the propensity of a complete and robust immune response.
When considering the mean time of presentation of MRONJ in osteoporotic patients, this review found the mean time in patients with disorders affecting immunosuppression to be shorter than in previous literature (31.1 months).,, If any conclusion can be drawn from this finding, it would be that a short time period of BP exposure does not necessarily constitute a safety threshold relating to the risk of MRONJ in patients and any invasive treatment on patients with BP therapy at any stage should involve a thorough risk assessment.
Other clinical findings in this review are mostly in agreement with clinical findings in other reported papers.,,,, Alendronate (alendronic acid) was the most frequent type of antiresorptive medication prescribed in patients who developed MRONJ. This is likely a result of alendronate being the most commonly delivered oral bisphosphonate for osteoporotic patients., This review observed that the majority of MRONJ was located in the mandible, predominantly in the molar region, and most frequently first observed as stage II according to the AAOMS diagnosis, seemingly aligned with previous research.
The significant heterogeneity in data prevented quantitative analysis, and while clear trends were evident in the collected data, these must be carefully interpreted in the context of vastly varied reporting and important voids in the available information pertaining to risk factors. However, the authors still consider the results from this review important and valuable in this poorly understood area of medicine. It is understandable that due to the infrequent incidence of MRONJ, it is difficult to improve the quality of evidence unless a collective effort is employed. Therefore, the authors believe that additional high-level evidence studies, such as multicenter studies, case–controlled studies, or randomized controlled trials, are necessary to determine whether patients in the immunosuppressed category have notable differences regarding the risk of MRONJ. This review sought to determine whether disorders of immunosuppression expose individuals to developing MRONJ and their associated outcomes following management. It seems prudent for further research to also focus on specific disorders of immunosuppression; to consider their physiology and to determine the extent and degree of involvement. In addition, this may allow for the evaluation of the mechanisms of involvement with these disorders of immunosuppression.
The authors advocate, in general, that the following rules should be applied for MRONJ observational studies:
- Diagnosis and staging of the disease should be assessed with standardized reproducible scales and should be calibrated among the clinicians involved in the study
- If randomization is feasible, it should be carried out and described in sufficient detail to allow an assessment of whether it produced comparable groups
- Common, quantifiable, and clinically relevant endpoints (time to complete wound healing, pain, specific investigations, treatment acceptability, and participant satisfaction) should be described in a sufficiently detailed manner
- A long follow-up period is essential to identify a predictable treatment effect
- A predictable special investigation, such as computed tomography (CT), cone-beam CT, or magnetic resonance imaging should be encouraged for the duration of follow-up to determine any local recurrence.
| Conclusion|| |
This is the first systematic review exploring the complex relationship between immunosuppressed patients with MRONJ. This study has observed and highlighted the absence of high-level evidence in the literature. Although some trends have been demonstrated in this review, it is currently difficult to ascertain quantitatively the susceptibility of immunosuppressed patients in the development of MRONJ. The available data suggest that more well-designed clinical studies are necessary to improve the evidence in managing this serious condition.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Coleman R, Body JJ, Aapro M, Hadji P, Herrstedt J, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Bone health in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 2014;25 Suppl 3:iii124-37.
Hanley DA, McClung MR, Davison KS, Dian L, Harris ST, Miller PD, et al
. Western osteoporosis alliance clinical practice series: Evaluating the balance of benefits and risks of long-term osteoporosis therapies. Am J Med 2017;130:862.e1-7.
Marx RE. Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: A growing epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1115-7.
Sivolella S, Lumachi F, Stellini F, Favero L. Denosumab and anti-angiogenetic drugrelated osteonecrosis of the jaw: An uncommon but potentially severe disease. Anticancer Res 2013:33:1793-8.
Ruggiero SL, Mehrotra B, Rosenberg TJ, Engroff SL. Osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with the use of bisphosphonates: A review of 63 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:527-34.
Brunello A, Saia G, Bedogni A, Scaglione D, Basso U. Worsening of osteonecrosis of the jaw during treatment with sunitinib in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Bone 2009;44:173-5.
Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R, Aghaloo T, Mehrotra B, et al
. American association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw—2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014:72:1938-56.
Rosella D, Papi P, Giardino R, Cicalini E, Piccoli L, Pompa G. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Clinical and practical guidelines. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016;6:97-104.
Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Assael LA, Landesberg R, Marx RE, Mehrotra B, et al
. American association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws–2009 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009:67 5 Suppl:2-12.
Saad F, Brown JE, Van Poznak C, Ibrahim T, Stemmer SM, Stopeck AT, et al
. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of osteonecrosis of the jaw: Integrated analysis from three blinded active-controlled phase III trials in cancer patients with bone metastases. Ann Oncol 2012;23:1341-7.
Heufelder MJ, Hendricks J, Remmerbach T, Frerich B, Hemprich A, Wilde F, et al
. Principles of oral surgery for prevention of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014;117:E429-35.
Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:6243s-9s.
Ficarra G, Beninati F. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: The point of view of the oral pathologist. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2007;4:53-7.
Guarneri V, Miles D, Robert N, Diéras V, Glaspy J, Smith I, et al
. Bevacizumab and osteonecrosis of the jaw: Incidence and association with bisphosphonate therapy in three large prospective trials in advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;122:181-8.
Campisi G, Lo Russo L, Agrillo A, Vescovi P, Fusco V, Bedogni A. BRONJ expert panel recommendation of the Italian Societies for Maxillofacial Surgery (SICMF) and Oral Pathology and Medicine (SIPMO) on Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws: Risk assessment, preventive strategies and dental management. Ital J Maxillofac Surg 2011:22:103-24.
Yamazaki T, Yamori M, Ishizaki T, Asai K, Goto K, Takahashi K, et al
. Increased incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw after tooth extraction in patients treated with bisphosphonates: A cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:1397-403.
Otto S, Schreyer C, Hafner S, Mast G, Ehrenfeld M, Stürzenbaum S, et al
. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws - characteristics, risk factors, clinical features, localization and impact on oncological treatment. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:303-9.
Khan AA, Morrison A, Hanley DA, Felsenberg D, McCauley LK, O'Ryan F, et al
. Diagnosis and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw: A systematic review and international consensus. J Bone Miner Res 2015:30:3-23.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al
. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
Higgins JP, Green S. editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (Updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration; 15 2011. Available from: http//www.cochrane-handbook.org
. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 02].
Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS, Aronson JK, von Schoen-Angerer T, Tugwell P, et al
. CARE guidelines for case reports: Explanation and elaboration document. J Clin Epidemiol 2017;89:218-35.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al
. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344-9.
Khamaisi M, Regev E, Yarom N, Avni B, Leitersdorf E, Raz I, et al
. Possible association between diabetes and bisphosphonate-related jaw osteonecrosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:1172-5.
Friedrich RE, Blake FA. Avascular mandibular osteonecrosis in association with bisphosphonate therapy: A report on four patients. Anticancer Res 2007;27:1841-5.
Song KE, Min YK, Lee JK, Lee KB, Joo HJ, Kwack KS, et al
. A probable case of oral bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw and recovery with parathyroid hormone treatment. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2008;69:356-62.
Bocanegra-Pérez S, Vicente-Barrero M, Sosa-Henríquez M, Gebaguer Blanco A, Knezevic M, Castellano-Navarro JM. Osteonecrosis of the jaw secondary to oral alendronate: Report of three cases. Rev Med Chil 2009;137:275-9.
Junquera L, Gallego L, Pelaz A, Olay S. Oral bisphosphonates-associated osteonecrosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:E292-4.
Junquera L, Gallego L, Cuesta P, Pelaz A, de Vicente JC. Clinical experiences with bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws: Analysis of 21 cases. Am J Otolaryngol 2009;30:390-5.
Park W, Kim NK, Kim MY, Rhee YM, Kim HJ. Osteonecrosis of the jaw induced by oral administration of bisphosphonates in Asian population: Five cases. Osteoporos Int 2010;21:527-33.
Mehanna P, Goddard R. Bisphosphonate associated osteonecrosis: An unusual case. Aust Dent J 2010;55:311-3.
O'Ryan FS, Lo JC. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with oral bisphosphonate exposure: Clinical course and outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:1844-53.
Park W, Lee SH, Park KR, Rho SH, Chung WY, Kim HJ. Characteristics of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after kidney transplantation. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:e510-4.
Nomura T, Shibahara T, Uchiyama T, Yamamoto N, Shibui T, Yakushiji T, et al
. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of jaw (BRONJ) in Japanese population: A case series of 13 patients at our clinic. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2013;54:117-25.
Chiu WY, Lee JJ, Tsai KS. Atypical femoral fractures shortly after osteonecrosis of the jaw in a postmenopausal woman taking alendronate for osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:E723-6.
Longato L, Cavalli L, Marcucci G, Metozzi A, Giusti F, Brandi ML, et al
. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in a patient with rheumatoid artritis treated with an oral aminobisphosphonate: A clinical case report. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2013;10:139-41.
Molcho S, Peer A, Berg T, Futerman B, Khamaisi M. Diabetes microvascular disease and the risk for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A single center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:E1807-12.
Di Fede O, Fusco V, Matranga D, Solazzo L, Gabriele M, Gaeta GM, et al
. Osteonecrosis of the jaws in patients assuming oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: A retrospective multi-hospital-based study of 87 Italian cases. Eur J Intern Med 2013;24:784-90.
Chiu WY, Chien JY, Yang WS, Juang JM, Lee JJ, Tsai KS. The risk of osteonecrosis of the jaws in Taiwanese osteoporotic patients treated with oral alendronate or raloxifene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:2729-35.
Alsalleeh F, Keippel J, Adams L, Bavitz B. Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of jaw reoccurrence after methotrexate therapy: A case report. J Endod 2014;40:1505-7.
Katz J, Ordoveza PA. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) associated with a once-yearly IV infusion of zoledronic acid (Reclast) 5 mg: Two cases and review of the literature. Quintessence Int 2014;45:685-90.
Preidl RH, Ebker T, Raithel M, Wehrhan F, Neukam FW, Stockmann P. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in a Crohn's disease patient following a course of Bisphosphonate and Adalimumab therapy: A case report. BMC Gastroenterol 2014;14:6.
Di Fede O, Bedogni A, Giancola F, Saia G, Bettini G, Toia F, et al
. BRONJ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter case series. Oral Dis 2016;22:543-8.
Favia G, Tempesta A, Limongelli L, Crincoli V, Iannone F, Lapadula G, et al
. A Case of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in a Patient with Crohn's Disease Treated with Infliximab. Am J Case Rep 2017;18:1351-6.
Furuya T, Maeda S, Momohara S, Taniguchi A, Yamanaka H. Dental treatments, tooth extractions, and osteonecrosis of the jaw in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the IORRA cohort study. J Bone Miner Metab 2017;35:344-50.
Furukawa S, Oobu K, Moriyama M, Kawano S, Sako S, Hayashida JN, et al
. Oral methotrexate-related lymphoproliferative disease presenting with severe osteonecrosis of the jaw: A case report and literature review. Intern Med 2018;57:575-81.
Mathai PC, Andrade NN, Aggarwal N, Nerurkar S, Kapoor P. Low-dose methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: A potential risk factor for bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;22:235-40.
Liao MT, Chien WC, Wang JC, Chung CH, Chu SJ, Tsai SH. Increased risk of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with Sjögren's syndrome: Nationwide population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e024655.
Steybe D, Voss PJ, Ermer MA, Fuessinger MA, Schmelzeisen R, Poxleitner P. Necrotizing fasciitis as a complication of osteonecrosis of the jaw related to oral bisphosphonate application in a patient with osteoporosis: A case report. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;23:83-9.
Fujieda Y, Doi M, Asaka T, Ota M, Hisada R, Ohnishi N, et al
. Incidence and risk of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) after tooth extraction in patients with autoimmune disease. J Bone Miner Metab 2020;38:581-8.
Badros A, Weikel D, Salama A, Goloubeva O, Schneider A, Rapoport A, et al
. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in multiple myeloma patients: Clinical features and risk factors. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:945-52.
Estilo CL, Van Poznak CH, Wiliams T, Bohle GC, Lwin PT, Zhou Q, et al
. Osteonecrosis of the maxilla and mandible in patients with advanced cancer treated with bisphosphonate therapy. Oncologist 2008;13:911-20.
Boonyapakorn T, Schirmer I, Reichart PA, Sturm I, Massenkeil G. Bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaws: Prospective study of 80 patients with multiple myeloma and other malignancies. Oral Oncol 2008;44:857-69.
Felsenberg D, Hoffmeister B, Jung T, Lopez-Schüler S, Bock O. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with osteoporosis-A remarkable risk of bisphosphonate treatment?. Bone 2009:44:s235-6.
Lazarovici TS, Yahalom R, Taicher S, Elad S, Hardan I, Yarom N. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: A single-center study of 101 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:850-5.
Lazarovici TS, Yahalom R, Taicher S, Schwartz-Arad D, Peleg O, Yarom N. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:790-6.
Höerauf N, Bumeder I, Otto S, Ebelt K, Vöelkl A, Baumann P, et al
. Incidence and risk factors of bisphosphonate induced osteonecrosis of the jaw (BONJ) in patients with multiple myeloma after HDT and ASCT. Onkologie 2010;33:245.
Bagur A, Mastaglia S. First cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw in two metabolic bone diseases services. J Bone Miner Res 2010;25:S335.
Kos M, Brusco D, Kuebler J, Engelke W. Clinical comparison of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaws, with and without a history of bisphosphonates administration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:1097-102.
Toro JJ, Varadarajan P, Schneider DL, Lee S, Chao JH, Frye BL, et al
. Oral and systemic complications of myeloma patients with bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw: A case-control study. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 2011;17:s275.
Brahim J, Meiller TF, Weikel DS, Scheper MA. Dental disease and myeloma associated bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:1074.
Borromeo GL, Brand C, Clement JG, McCullough M, Thomson W, Flitzanis E, et al
. Is bisphosphonate therapy for benign bone disease associated with impaired dental healing? A case-controlled study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:71.
Then C, Hörauf N, Otto S, Pautke C, von Tresckow E, Röhnisch T, et al
. Incidence and risk factors of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in multiple myeloma patients having undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. Onkologie 2012;35:658-64.
Vestergaard P, Schwartz K, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L, Pinholt EM. Oral bisphosphonate use increases the risk for inflammatory jaw disease: A cohort study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:821-9.
Thumbigere-Math V, Tu L, Huckabay S, Dudek AZ, Lunos S, Basi DL, et al
. A retrospective study evaluating frequency and risk factors of osteonecrosis of the jaw in 576 cancer patients receiving intravenous bisphosphonates. Am J Clin Oncol 2012;35:386-92.
Badros A, Philip S, Lesho P, Sadowska M, Weikel D, Meiller T, et al
. Cytokine alteration in multiple myeloma (MM) patients and bisphosphonate (BP)-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). Blood 2013;122:3153.
Ebker T, Rech J, von Wilmowsky C, Neukam FW, Stockmann P. Fulminant course of osteonecrosis of the jaw in a rheumatoid arthritis patient following oral bisphosphonate intake and biologic therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52:218-20.
Avilés A, Neri N, Huerta-Guzmán J, Nambo MJ. Randomized clinical trial of zoledronic acid in multiple myeloma patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell transplantation. Curr Oncol 2013;20:e13-20.
Watters AL, Hansen HJ, Williams T, Chou JF, Riedel E, Halpern J, et al
. Intravenous bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Long-term follow-up of 109 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;115:192-200.
Pichardo SE, Kuypers SC, van Merkesteyn JP. Denosumab osteonecrosis of the mandible: A new entity? A case report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013;41:e65-9.
Mizohata K, Sano T, Matsuo Y, Oishi K, Morita S. Successful treatment of BRONJ in the palatal torus with teriparatide. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:e90-1.
Favia G, Tempesta A, Limongelli L, Crincoli V, Piattelli A, Maiorano E. Metastatic Breast Cancer in Medication-Related Osteonecrosis Around Mandibular Implants. Am J Case Rep 2015;16:621-6.
Pilanci KN, Alco G, Ordu C, Sarsenov D, Celebi F, Erdogan Z, et al
. Is administration of trastuzumab an independent risk factor for developing osteonecrosis of the jaw among metastatic breast cancer patients under zoledronic acid treatment? Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e671.
Vidal-Real C, Pérez-Sayáns M, Suárez-Peñaranda JM, Gándara-Rey JM, García-García A. Osteonecrosis of the jaws in 194 patients who have undergone intravenous bisphosphonate therapy in Spain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2015;20:e267-72.
Jarnbring F, Kashani A, Björk A, Hoffman T, Krawiec K, Ljungman P, et al
. Role of intravenous dosage regimens of bisphosphonates in relation to other aetiological factors in the development of osteonecrosis of the jaws in patients with myeloma. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;53:1007-11.
Kajizono M, Sada H, Sugiura Y, Soga Y, Kitamura Y, Matsuoka J, et al
. Incidence and Risk Factors of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Advanced Cancer Patients after Treatment with Zoledronic Acid or Denosumab: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Biol Pharm Bull 2015;38:1850-5.
Rahimi-Nedjat RK, Sagheb K, Pabst A, Olk L, Walter C. Diabetes Mellitus and Its Association to the Occurrence of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw. Dent J (Basel) 2016;4:17.
Bejhed RS, Kharazmi M, Hallberg P. Identification of Risk Factors for Bisphosphonate-Associated Atypical Femoral Fractures and Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in a Pharmacovigilance Database. Ann Pharmacother 2016;50:616-24.
Paek SJ, Park WJ, Shin HS, Choi MG, Kwon KH, Choi EJ. Diseases having an influence on inhibition of angiogenesis as risk factors of osteonecrosis of the jaw. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;42:271-7.
Gambino A, Arduino PG, Bertetto O, Cabras M, Fusco V, Broccoletti R. MRONJ epidemiology: The experience of the “Oncological Network of North-Western Italy”. Oral Dis 2016;22:5-9.
Suzuki A, Yoshida M, Mori M, Sakamoto Y. Clinical features and predictive factors of oral bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: An analysis of 8 cases in a single institution. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1345-6.
Patel R. Osteonecrosis of the maxilla: Case report. Reactions 2017;1662:135-29.
Hayashi M, Morimoto Y, Iida T, Tanaka Y, Sugiyama S. Risk of delayed healing of tooth extraction wounds and osteonecrosis of the jaw among patients treated with potential immunosuppressive drugs: A retrospective cohort study. Tohoku J Exp Med 2018;246:257-64.
Medeiros CK, de Pontes Santos HB, Rolim LS, Mororó AB, Germano AR, de Medeiros AM, et al
. Importance of correct management of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Case report and literature review. J Oral Diagn 2018:3:1-6.
Shudo A, Kishimoto H, Takaoka K, Noguchi K. Long-term oral bisphosphonates delay healing after tooth extraction: A single institutional prospective study. Osteoporos Int 2018;29:2315-21.
Wazzan T, Kashtwari D, Almaden WF, Gong Y, Chen Y, Moreb J, et al
. Radiographic bone loss and the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in multiple myeloma patients – A retrospective case control study. Spec Care Dent 2018;38:356-61.
Soares AL, Simon S, Gebrim LH, Nazário ACP, Lazaretti-Castro M. Prevalence and risk factors of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporotic and breast cancer patients: A cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer 2020;28:2265-71.
Son HJ, Kim JW, Kim SJ. Pharmacoepidemiology and clinical characteristics of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;41:26.
Freire ND, Heimlich FV, Ramos ME, Antero SA, Israel MS. Prevention protocol for bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaws in a patient with HIV. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2020;129:E131-2.
Kyrgidis A, Vahtsevanos K. Risk factors for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2553-4.
Vescovi P, Campisi G, Fusco V, Mergoni G, Manfredi M, Merigo E, et al
. Surgery-triggered and non surgery-triggered bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ): A retrospective analysis of 567 cases in an Italian multicenter study. Oral Oncol 2011;47:191-4.
Conte-Neto N, Bastos AS, Spolidorio LC, Marcantonio RA, Marcantonio E Jr., Oral bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A critical discussion and two case reports. Head Face Med 2011;7:7.
Badros A, Terpos E, Katodritou E, Goloubeva O, Kastritis E, Verrou E, et al
. Natural history of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5904-9.
Diniz-Freitas M, López-Cedrún JL, Fernández-Sanromán J, García-García A, Fernández-Feijoo J, Diz-Dios P. Oral bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: Clinical characteristics of a series of 20 cases in Spain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e751-8.
Favia G, Pilolli GP, Maiorano E. Osteonecrosis of the jaw correlated to bisphosphonate therapy in non-oncologic patients: Clinicopathological features of 24 patients. J Rheumatol 2009;36:2780-7.
Malden N, Lopes V. An epidemiological study of alendronate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. A case series from the south-east of Scotland with attention given to case definition and prevalence. J Bone Miner Metab 2012;30:171-82.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8]